Yesterday, the European Patent Office announced that its grant rant dropped – for the first time since the Office opened in 1978 – to below 50%. IAM Magazine was quick to notice that this places the allowance rates of all three trilateral offices – the United States, Europe, and Japan – below 50%.
Categorized | Uncategorized
-
Creative Commons wine – Share
-
The ignored duty to disseminate patent- and trademark-related information to the public
- Patent and Trademark Office closed on Monday, December 21, 2009 due to snow storm
-
Friday food for thought: Did the Patent and Trademark Office leave $118 million on the table?
-
FTC sues patent reformer Intel for damage done to innovation and consumers
-
Patented 1905
-
The PTO predicament – keeping up with constant change on a grand scale
-
Kappos on patent reform – legislation will absolutely reduce application pendency
-
The USPTO Practitioner Maintenance Fee – Back on the table?
- Oral argument next week for en banc review of extraterritorial patent infringement
-
Google's sea-based data center patent highlights the narrow focus of the company's call for patent reform
-
The best choice for Under Secretary for IP/Director of the Patent and Trademark Office - a fresh face with more than the right resume
- The practitioner maintenance fee and the promise that should not have been made
-
S Lamm: Reticence is not surprising - the economics profes...
-
staff: "Director Kappos thinks the legislation could “hel...
-
ROBERT GIULIANI: What is the status of The Patent Reform Act of 200...
-
Eduardo dela Pena: CHINA 2009 PATENT LAW REVISION REFORMS PATENT PROB...
-
lawyers: I am confused whether this idea is positive or neg...
110HR1907
110hr1908
110S1145
abstract
allowance rate
Amazon
amgen
antibodies
backlog
Bilski
BPAI
CAFC
claim construction
claim limit rules
coalition for patent fairness
continuation rules
dudas
dystar
ebay
EPO
esd
fee diversion
Google
Graham v. John Deere
ids
injunctive relief
Intel
Kaptur
ksr
KSR v. Teleflex
litigation
markush
nonobviousness
Obama
obviousness
patent reform
Patent Reform Act of 2009
practitioner maintenance fee
proposed rules
ptp
rss
rule changes
Tafas v. Dudas
USPTO
uspto.gov
Stay up to date
- Subscribe to the RSS feed
- Subscribe to the feed via email
© Promote the Progress. Powered by Wordpress.
Discussion
There are No responses to this post, including 0 comments, 0 pings, 0 tweetbacks, and 0 related tweets.
You can join the discussion by leaving a comment on this page using the form at the bottom, by pinging the page with a post on your own site, or by adding a tweet to your Twitter page that mentions the post.
I try to collect related tweets that readers of the post will find helpful or interesting. If you know of a tweet that provides background content, a different viewpoint, or other relevant information, please send me a link to the tweet.
Leave a comment