<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Judiciary Committee passes Patent Reform Act of 2009 to Senate floor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://promotetheprogress.com/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2009-to-senate-floor/1170/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://promotetheprogress.com/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2009-to-senate-floor/1170/</link>
	<description>Informed and insightful analysis of patent law issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:32:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ROBERT GIULIANI</title>
		<link>http://promotetheprogress.com/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2009-to-senate-floor/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>ROBERT GIULIANI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/?p=1170#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>What is the status of The Patent Reform Act of 2009 as of 29 NOV 2009? I tried to copy it from the internet but have not been able to find it there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the status of The Patent Reform Act of 2009 as of 29 NOV 2009? I tried to copy it from the internet but have not been able to find it there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two reasons why the Patent Reform Act of 2009 is going nowhere&#8230;.for now</title>
		<link>http://promotetheprogress.com/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2009-to-senate-floor/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>Two reasons why the Patent Reform Act of 2009 is going nowhere&#8230;.for now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/?p=1170#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>[...] Judiciary Committee gave us a watershed moment in the patent reform movement when, last week, it approved an amended version of the Patent Reform Act of 2009. The Committee&#8217;s action is a significant step toward enactment of comprehensive patent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Judiciary Committee gave us a watershed moment in the patent reform movement when, last week, it approved an amended version of the Patent Reform Act of 2009. The Committee&#8217;s action is a significant step toward enactment of comprehensive patent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Reform Act of 2009, as reported by Senate Judiciary Committee</title>
		<link>http://promotetheprogress.com/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2009-to-senate-floor/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Reform Act of 2009, as reported by Senate Judiciary Committee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/?p=1170#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>[...] The GPO has published the S.515, The Patent Reform Act of 2009, as reported out of the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 2, 2009. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GPO has published the S.515, The Patent Reform Act of 2009, as reported out of the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 2, 2009. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redline version of The Patent Reform Act of 2009 as approved by Senate Judiciary Committee</title>
		<link>http://promotetheprogress.com/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2009-to-senate-floor/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>Redline version of The Patent Reform Act of 2009 as approved by Senate Judiciary Committee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/?p=1170#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>[...] by an agreement between the competing camps, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted last week to pass the Patent Reform Act of 2009 to the full Senate for debate. The Committee adopted a manager&#8217;s amendment that embodies the changes required by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by an agreement between the competing camps, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted last week to pass the Patent Reform Act of 2009 to the full Senate for debate. The Committee adopted a manager&#8217;s amendment that embodies the changes required by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Reform Bill Passes Judiciary Committee &#171; Patent Law Links and Commentary (Jaideep Venkatesan)</title>
		<link>http://promotetheprogress.com/senate-judiciary-committee-passes-patent-reform-act-of-2009-to-senate-floor/1170/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Reform Bill Passes Judiciary Committee &#171; Patent Law Links and Commentary (Jaideep Venkatesan)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://promotetheprogress.com/blog/?p=1170#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>[...] have preferred to have the originally proposed revision to damages calculations. Others, including  Promote the Progress  and the  Salt Lake City Tribune , suggest it was because the bill failed to revise the standard for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have preferred to have the originally proposed revision to damages calculations. Others, including  Promote the Progress  and the  Salt Lake City Tribune , suggest it was because the bill failed to revise the standard for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
